Search

Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC)

The EU’s Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC) was established in 2011 to enhance cooperation between the tax authorities of EU Member States. Its primary objective is to combat tax evasion and fraudulent activity by facilitating the exchange of financial data. The sharing of data allows tax authorities to identify discrepancies, detect aggressive tax schemes, and ensure that individuals and businesses pay the correct amount of tax for their business activities.

The Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC) has evolved over time, the most recent amendment being DAC 8 in 2023, which addresses the exchange of information on crypto assets and e-money. The previous amendment was DAC 7 in 2021, that was aimed at ensuring that Member States automatically exchange information on revenues arising from sellers on digital platforms, in the EU and outside of the EU. The most relevant amendment for ISLA members, was DAC 6 (Directive 2018/822 EU) which refers to the mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation, in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements.

DAC6 forms part of the EU’s Mandatory Disclosure Rules (MDR’s) adopted in 2018. The amendment to the DAC Directive introduced the obligation of both intermediaries and the taxpayers in some cases, to disclose their tax planning to reduce harmful tax practices. This was one of the most significant changes for tax advisors, service providers and taxpayers in recent times, and DAC 6 was created as a direct response to Action 12 of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) reports.

Regulation Overview

Graphic of a plus symbol Graphic of a minus symbol

Businesses that may be entering into or advising on cross-border arrangements within EU jurisdictions, will need to review where mandatory reporting will be required. DAC6 applies to arrangements that fall within certain hallmark requirements, where the expected benefit can result in a tax advantage via a CRS Common Reporting Standard (CRS), which is global standard for the exchange of automatic tax and financial information. This data will then be shared to a central directory that is accessible by the National Competent Authority in each Member State. Failure to comply with the new directive amendment can result in penalties and sanctions imposed by local tax authorities as well as reputational risk.

What is a Hallmark?

A set of specific characteristics or features of cross border arrangements that could potentially present an indication of risk of tax evasion as listed in Annex IV of the Directive. As part of the Directive, hallmarks are split into 5 categories. Hallmarks only apply if a threshold ‘main benefit’ test is reached. Hallmark categories are as follows:

  • Category A – Generic hallmarks linked to main benefits test
  • Category B – Specific hallmarks linked to main benefits test.
  • Category C – Specific hallmarks that relate to cross border payments
  • Category D – Hallmarks undermining reporting obligations
  • Category E – Hallmarks undermining reporting obligations

What is a ‘Main Benefit’ test?

The test indicates that the main objective of the arrangement, is to obtain a tax advantage. This can be extremely difficult to interpret.

What is an intermediary?

This can be any firm or person that ‘designs, markets, organises or makes available for implementation or manages the implementation of a reportable cross-border-arrangement (RCBA)’. These include, but are not limited to, accountants, lawyers, banks and insurers.

What must be reported?

  • Identity of taxpayers and any intermediaries involved in a transaction which includes, but are not limited to, tax ID number, tax residence, and name and place of birth if the taxpayer is an individual.
  • Applicable hallmarks
  • Relevant local legislation
  • Summary of arrangement
  • Value of arrangement

What are the penalties for non-disclosure?

The Directive states that any penalties implemented into local legislation within an EU Member State must be ‘effective, proportionate and dissuasive’. Failure to comply could also lead to reputational damage as well as sanctions.

Impacts to Securities Lending & Borrowing

Graphic of a plus symbol Graphic of a minus symbol

Taxation and its interaction with our markets is an important area of focus for ISLA. As mentioned above, the DAC 6 hallmarks will only apply if the threshold ‘main benefit’ test is met whereby, you can identify that the main outcome of an arrangement is for a tax advantage. This can be particularly tough to apply; where firms would understand the broad commercial rationale behind their client’s transactions, it is unlikely that they would know when entering into a securities lending agreement why a client is entering into it specifically, and especially whether it is tax motivated, unless this is agreed prior to terms of contract. Whilst the MDR’s can be widely interpreted, it is clear that the spirit of the Directive is to disclose anything that has a significant tax outcome due to the structure of the transaction. DAC 6 is mainly focused at large corporate transactions, and the impact of potential financial and reputational damage is too large for firms engaging in securities lending to ignore. Firms must understand which transaction types are affected under the disclosure regime, and identify any transactions undertaken throughout the transition period. Where a financial institution is acting solely as a counterparty to a securities lending transaction or as an agent organising the transaction, then firms will need to clarify whether they were acting as an ‘intermediary’.

For more information on how DAC 6 applies to securities lending and borrowing, please see our Position Paper, drafting with Deloitte LLP here.

ISLA's Focus on the Topic

Graphic of a plus symbol Graphic of a minus symbol

If you wish to participate in discussions around DAC and other tax matter relating to securities lending and borrowing – please sign up to ISLA’s Tax Working Group. For enquiries, please contact regtech@isalemea.org

Timeline

  • The DAC is adopted, establishing the framework for the automatic exchange of information

    07/01/2011

    July 2011

  • The DAC 6 is introduced to target aggressive tax planning schemes by requiring reporting of cross-border tax arrangements

    06/01/2018

    June 2018

  • DAC 8 is adopted, focusing on the reporting and exchange of information on crypto-asset transactions and advance tax rulings for high-net-worth individuals

    07/03/2023

    July 2023

  • The DAC is amended to include the exchange of information from dividends and account balances

    01/01/2014

    January 2014

  • DAC 7 is adopted to enhance tax transparency by requiring digital platforms to report information on sellers of goods and services

    12/02/2021

    December 2021

Select a category from the dropdown

Archive

Can’t find a specific document or legacy agreement?

Contact us

Back to Taxation

Back

Already a member? Login to your account

ISLA Working Groups

ISLA runs a variety of standing and topic specific working groups for its members, covering all aspects of advocacy, tax, legal, regulation and best practice. These include SFTR, CSDR, Legal & Regulatory Broadcasts and Best Practice.

Click here to find out more